|In Defense of PULP
||January 19, 2001
|RANT #48: Misc.
||The Marquis de Guillermo
Summary: Although I have never read Airduct, I feel in a position to make vast, judgmental statements about it.
|1] SPIN is a good magazine.|
2] SPIN is published online.
3] PULP is published online.
THUS: Pulp is a good magazine.
1] The OFFICIAL Backstreet Boys Photo Mag is a god-awful magazine.
2] The OFFICIAL Backstreet Boys Photo Mag is not published online.
3] AIRDUCT is not published online.
THUS: AIRDUCT is a god-awful magazine.
I have never read this "Airduct", as I am not a high school student at a small high school somewhere in cold, cold Canada.
I am, however, studying the discipline of Philosophy at a prestigious Ivy League school. Through these studies, I have learned the science of logic, and also how to devote my rational mind to things intellectual. The syllogisms stated above, which I have developed in tandem with ESPN Sports, show irrefutably the high quality of the "PULP" magazine, and the low quality of this "AIRDUCT" rag.
Aristotle. _Metaphysics_. New York: Lion Gate Reprints. 1996.
Wilson, Theodore. _Logic and Its Uses_. Toronto: University Press. 1978.
Fung-Chavez, Eric. _The Magazine Industry: What's Good and What's Not_. San Francisco: Hip Books. 2001.
Add a comment to this rant: